"We're private, so Ind AS doesn't apply to us": What the ₹250 crore net worth threshold actually triggers

A founder closes a ₹180 crore Series C. The auditor mentions Ind AS at the year-end planning meeting. The founder waves it off — "that's for listed companies." Eight months later the statutory auditor refuses to sign the FY 2026-27 accounts without a full Ind AS transition, the company has no opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2025, and the lender's covenant test fails because lease liabilities that never existed under IGAAP have appeared on the balance sheet overnight.

Ind AS applicability has nothing to do with being listed. It is a net worth test, and it catches private limited companies every year.

What the law actually requires

The governing instrument is the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, notified under Section 133 of the Companies Act 2013, which empowers the Central Government to prescribe accounting standards. Rule 4 sets out the phased applicability.

The three-tier structure:

Phase I (mandatory from FY 2016-17): Companies listed or in the process of listing on any stock exchange in India or outside, with net worth of ₹500 crore or more; unlisted companies with net worth of ₹500 crore or more; and the holding, subsidiary, joint venture, or associate companies of any of the above.

Phase II (mandatory from FY 2017-18): All listed companies (regardless of net worth, subject to the SME exchange carve-out); unlisted companies with net worth of ₹250 crore or more but less than ₹500 crore; and — this is the clause founders miss — the holding, subsidiary, joint venture, and associate companies of those companies.

Phase III: NBFCs, covered by a separate schedule under Rule 4(1)(iv), with the ₹500 crore threshold applying from FY 2018-19 and ₹250 crore from FY 2019-20.

Two carve-outs that matter. Companies listed only on the SME exchange (BSE SME or NSE Emerge) are specifically excluded from mandatory Ind AS under the proviso to Rule 4(1). And insurance companies, banking companies, and NBFCs are excluded from the general Rule 4 corporate schedule and follow their own regulator-specified route.

How net worth is computed. Net worth takes the definition in Section 2(57) of the Companies Act 2013: aggregate value of paid-up share capital and all reserves created out of profits and securities premium account, less accumulated losses, deferred expenditure, and miscellaneous expenditure not written off. Critically, it excludes reserves created out of revaluation of assets, write-back of depreciation, and amalgamation.

Rule 4(2) is explicit on timing: net worth is computed on the basis of the standalone financial statements as at 31 March 2014 or the first audited period thereafter, and the standard applies from the immediately following accounting year once the threshold is met in any financial year.

The one-way door. Rule 4(2) proviso: once a company is covered by Ind AS, it must continue to prepare financial statements under Ind AS even if it subsequently ceases to meet the threshold. A fall from ₹280 crore net worth back to ₹190 crore does not release you. There is no exit.

The group-drag rule. Rule 4(1)(ii)(b) and 4(1)(iii)(b) pull in holding companies, subsidiaries, joint ventures, and associates of a covered company. A ₹12 crore net worth subsidiary of a ₹300 crore parent is on Ind AS. Founders of small subsidiaries routinely have no idea this applies to them until the parent's group auditor asks for an Ind AS reporting package.

Practical implications

Transition mechanics under Ind AS 101. If Ind AS becomes applicable for FY 2026-27, the date of transition is 1 April 2025, not 1 April 2026. You need an opening Ind AS balance sheet as at 1 April 2025 and a full restated comparative for FY 2025-26. This is why a company that discovers the requirement in December 2026 is already fifteen months behind — you are reconstructing a balance sheet from a year that closed nine months ago.

The five differences that move the numbers most:

Ind AS 116 (Leases). IGAAP's AS 19 kept operating leases entirely off balance sheet. Ind AS 116 abolishes the operating/finance distinction for lessees. Every office lease, warehouse lease, and equipment lease with a term over 12 months becomes a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. A company with three office leases can add ₹15–40 crore of debt to its balance sheet with no change in commercial reality. Rent expense disappears and is replaced by depreciation plus interest — which increases EBITDA while worsening the debt-equity ratio.

Ind AS 109 (Financial Instruments) — expected credit loss. IGAAP provided for receivables when a specific default occurred. Ind AS 109 requires a forward-looking ECL provision on day one, on every trade receivable, using a provision matrix under the simplified approach. Companies with clean historical collections still book a first-time ECL charge.

Ind AS 115 (Revenue). The five-step model can shift revenue recognition timing materially for SaaS, construction, and bundled-service businesses. Multiple-element arrangements must be unbundled and allocated to standalone selling prices.

Ind AS 12 (Income Taxes). IGAAP's AS 22 used the income statement approach. Ind AS 12 uses the balance sheet approach, recognising deferred tax on temporary differences between carrying amount and tax base — which pulls in items AS 22 never touched, including the deferred tax on the new right-of-use assets.

Ind AS 103 (Business Combinations). Purchase price allocation at fair value, recognition of separately identifiable intangibles, and goodwill that is tested for impairment rather than amortised. Every past acquisition must be re-examined, unless you elect the Ind AS 101 exemption not to restate prior business combinations.

What goes wrong when you ignore it. Financial statements prepared under the wrong framework are non-compliant with Section 133. Under Section 129(7), where financial statements do not comply with the applicable accounting standards, the managing director, whole-time director in charge of finance, the CFO, and any other person charged by the Board are punishable with imprisonment up to one year, or fine of ₹50,000 to ₹5,00,000, or both.

The auditor's exposure is separate. Under Section 143(3)(e), the auditor must state whether the financial statements comply with the accounting standards. A non-compliance forces a qualified or adverse opinion — which is disclosed in the AOC-4 filed with the ROC and becomes a permanent public record. NFRA has jurisdiction over Ind AS companies above specified thresholds under the NFRA Rules 2018, and audit quality reviews of Ind AS transitions are an active enforcement area.

MCA21 v3 implications. AOC-4 has a distinct filing variant — AOC-4 (Ind AS) — with its own XBRL taxonomy. Filing a standard AOC-4 for a company whose master data indicates Ind AS applicability, or a mismatch between the declared net worth in the form and the reported reserves, is precisely the kind of internal inconsistency MCA21 v3's validation layer flags for scrutiny. The v3 system carries forward prior-year data, so a net worth that crosses ₹250 crore in one year and a non-Ind AS AOC-4 the next is a visible discrepancy.

Under Section 137(3), late AOC-4 filing carries ₹10,000 plus ₹100 per day of continuing default, with a cap of ₹2,00,000 for the company and ₹50,000 for each officer in default. A transition that is not planned becomes a late filing.

Step-by-step: what to do

• Compute Section 2(57) net worth from the latest audited standalone balance sheet. Not consolidated. Not management accounts. Strip out revaluation reserve and amalgamation reserve. If the figure is between ₹200 crore and ₹250 crore, treat it as an early-warning band — a single funding round or a profitable year can cross it.
• Map the group. List every holding company, subsidiary, associate, and joint venture. If any single entity in that chain is Ind AS-covered, every entity in the chain is covered. This is the step most often skipped.
• Fix the transition date immediately. If FY 2026-27 is the first Ind AS year, the transition date is 1 April 2025. Confirm you still have the underlying records — lease agreements, receivable ageing, acquisition documentation — for that date.
• Choose Ind AS 101 exemptions before you start converting. The optional exemptions (deemed cost for property, plant and equipment; non-restatement of past business combinations; cumulative translation differences reset to nil) materially reduce effort. The deemed cost exemption alone can eliminate months of work. Document each election in the Board minutes.
• Run a lease inventory first. Ind AS 116 is almost always the largest single balance-sheet impact. Extract every lease with a term over 12 months, determine the incremental borrowing rate, and compute the right-of-use asset and lease liability.
• Warn your lenders before the numbers change. Debt-equity, current ratio, and interest coverage covenants are usually drafted against IGAAP numbers. Ind AS 116 alone can breach a debt-equity covenant with no change in the business. Negotiate a frozen-GAAP clause or a covenant reset in writing before the first Ind AS balance sheet is signed.
• Prepare Ind AS 101 disclosures. Paragraphs 24–25 require reconciliations of equity at the transition date and at the end of the last IGAAP period, and a reconciliation of total comprehensive income for that comparative period. These are mandatory and are the first thing an audit quality reviewer reads.
• Confirm the AOC-4 (Ind AS) filing variant with your practising professional before the ROC filing window, and align the XBRL tagging with the new Schedule III Division II format.

FAQ

Our net worth crossed ₹250 crore only because of a share premium on a funding round. Does that count?
Yes. Securities premium is expressly included in the Section 2(57) definition of net worth. A large premium on a small allotment can push a company over the line even where accumulated profits are negligible.

We are a ₹9 crore subsidiary of a ₹400 crore parent. Do we really need Ind AS standalone accounts?
Yes. Rule 4(1)(ii)(b) covers subsidiaries of covered companies without a size floor. Your standalone financial statements must be Ind AS-compliant, not merely your group reporting package.

Can we apply Ind AS voluntarily and then go back to IGAAP if it proves too expensive?
No. Rule 4(1)(i) permits voluntary adoption, but the Rule 4(2) proviso makes it irreversible — a company that voluntarily adopts Ind AS must continue with it permanently. Voluntary adoption is a one-way decision and should be taken only with a clear reason, such as an IPO within three years.

We listed on NSE Emerge. Are we covered?
No, not on that basis alone. The proviso to Rule 4(1) excludes companies listed or in the process of listing on SME exchanges from mandatory Ind AS. But the net worth test still applies independently — an SME-listed company with ₹250 crore net worth is covered under the unlisted-company limb.

---

For a compliance audit of your company, visit pvtltd.co

---

See Also

• "It's just an internal review": what actually triggers a forensic audit and how the findings end up in an NCLT petition or an FIR
• "The CA handles the tax audit": What Form 3CD actually reports about your company
• "We already have a statutory auditor": why Section 138 may still require you to appoint an internal auditor